Quantcast
Channel: In Defense of the Church
Viewing all 1135 articles
Browse latest View live

Why I finally returned to the Catholic Church

$
0
0
Revert Story from Catholic Anchor

By CHARLIE ESS

With pain comes perfection, Christ taught. Thanks to the gift of the Catholic Church we are able to reach this perfection through a glorious journey. But for too many years this was not the way for me.

My parents planted the hope of salvation and the reality of heaven within me during the impressionable years of adolescence. Practice in faith and good works as a cradle Catholic included a few years as an altar boy and a strong sense of compassion as I worked my way through the lower grades in a Catholic school.

Five decades later, however, I’m looking back with envy at that child in terms of purity, the quest to embrace the sacraments — which included the possibility of holy orders — and good works as a way of strengthening my spiritual life. How simple it seemed then to keep my soul spotlessly clean with the belief that in the event of sudden death the Kingdom of God was unquestionably at hand.

Now, I face the reality that, like everybody else, I must one day die. Moreover, I have some catching up to do after a hiatus of nearly 30 years from the Catholic Church.

I moved to Alaska in 1978, and though there was ample opportunity to continue attending Mass and receiving the sacraments, I lived life on the beaches, the mountains and on boats. Though I believed in God as the Creator, I did not live the life of a religious hermit as I had originally intended. Instead I embraced wide ranging religious ideologies. I gravitated toward secular thinking and found plenty of camaraderie. What didn’t come in the form of worldly ways during my life as a commercial fisherman surely befell me when I entered a licentious period as a writer. I had joined the national subculture of some 20 million baptized Catholics who no longer practice their faith. I had become a “fallen away Catholic,” as my grandfather used to call those who left the church either in quest of liberties granted by other forms of theology or those who walked away from any sort of Christly tethers altogether.

My departure from the Catholic Church left me with an uneasiness whenever I contemplated my journey with God. I knew too much about the Catechism and caught myself trying to arrive at various checkpoints in the journey through a feigned innocence. Not that other churches I had attended condoned my immorality, but I had drifted away from a discipline, an essential way of thinking, of praying, of examining conscience and of confessing.

Most tangible among the triggers would be the periodic discovery of one of my rosaries out among books or other trinkets in a storage shed. Though the familiarity of its beads would bring pangs of a guilt that I would later associate with a nudging of the conscience to grow closer to God, it was divine intervention and the intuition of my wife Cheryl that eventually lead me back to the Catholic Church.

Like many couples, we struggled in our marriage, and though we knew God must be at its center, we so often got caught up within ourselves. Cheryl, meanwhile, had begun watching EWTN and had a growing curiosity about the magnitude of Mary in Catholicism. This occurred shortly after we moved to the Palmer side of the Matanuska Valley.

At the same time, as parents we had started “church hopping” in our desire to provide some Godly roots for our kids. For several months we were unable to reach consensus in joining churches of this or that denomination, and we settled the matter by rotating among individual choices each Sunday. On a particular weekend, when it seemed we had tried them all, it was my turn, and I suggested attending Mass at St. Michael Catholic Church in Palmer. I prepared myself for our awkward genuflections and kneeling during the consecration.

While the kids had questions about incense, holy water and other rituals after Mass, Cheryl experienced an epiphany of sorts and shortly thereafter enrolled in the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults (RCIA), by which adults come into the Catholic Church. A year later, on the eve of her confirmation and first Holy Communion Father Tom Brundage asserted our marital vows — this time they were sacramental.

As for me, the return to the faith has been blissful as I rediscover the purpose of spiritual tools that were given to me when I was young. In a sense I have arrived, broken, but back at the threshold of a great workshop that I’ve had access to since I was a kid. At its center, like some great lathe or milling machine, is Christ’s passion, replete with the original manual on how to accept pain and create selflessness, and the periphery has been festooned with the seven sacraments, with Sacred Scripture, Holy Mass, adoration, the daily recitation of the Rosary and countless chaplets and prayers. Practicing one aspect of the faith, I have discovered, leads to a desire to practice others.

I still struggle with sin, the reality of death and the endlessness of eternity like I imagine anyone who’s bothered contemplating such matters might. With my return to Catholic discipline, however, I find hope in reaching for perfection as each day ticks toward the end of my tenure here on earth. And hope fuels my journey toward eternity, one day at a time.

More Than Enough - Conversion Story of Kathy McDonald

$
0
0
Conversion Story from Coming Home Network

Our third son was 10 days old on “Reformation Sunday” 1998. The preacher that Sunday at the local Lutheran church we attended was a retired Lutheran school principal, a man in his 70s with a great shock of white hair. He ascended the pulpit and held up a book, a book he proclaimed “the work of the devil!” The book was by a Catholic author on justification. The preacher offered this book as evidence that “the Reformation must go on!” To me, he came across as so angry and fearful, so unreasonably opposed to the Catholic author, that I leaned over and whispered to my husband, Joe, and said “Sounds like a book we ought to read.”

Though we were Lutheran, my husband was on the faculty of a Catholic college in a small town to which we had moved just two months before our son was born. Joe found the book in the college library and brought it home for me to read. That was the beginning of the end of my life as a Lutheran.

Sound beginnings

I was born and raised in a conservative German Lutheran family (Lutheran Church Missouri Synod or LCMS), the third of five children; I was baptized as an infant, as were all my siblings. We attended church and Sunday School every Sunday without fail even when traveling. My happiest childhood memories are from church, particularly Christmas and Easter. I always had a lively faith and took to heart everything I could grasp at church. The messages of Advent and Lent, delivered through the Wednesday night services our family faithfully attended, left deep impressions on my heart. One year, I was quite surprised to wake up one Christmas morning to find Jesus had not returned yet, because so vividly and urgently had our pastor proclaimed His Second Coming that Advent! I loved singing the beautiful, strong hymns of our church and participating in the liturgy even though I couldn’t understand why we told God we were “hardly” [heartily] sorry for our sins in the Confession of Sins each Sunday. I regularly and devoutly read my treasured book of Bible stories, the only religious book in our home, which I had won for perfect Sunday School attendance.

By the time of my Lutheran confirmation when I was in the eighth grade, I was concerned I didn’t have “real faith.” I had questions about the Bible: “How do I know someone didn’t just make this up?” and “How can anyone know the truth?” Typical adolescent questioning, but I was tortured by these threats to my faith. I was afraid I was an atheist when I was confirmed and prayed God would just “zap” me with unwavering faith at the moment of confirmation. It didn’t happen. I wasn’t zapped. But I did get a wonderful gift of a prayer book for the event and settled on a “Prayer for Faith” that has sustained me since that day. “Lord, I believe,” the prayer goes, “Help Thou mine unbelief. Strengthen Thou this weak and flickering faith.”

I prayed that prayer often through high school as I struggled with doubts. Truly I sought God but didn’t know where to find Him.


I got involved in Young Life (a Christian ministry for middle school through college age students) for a while, which was an eye-opening experience. It was there I first experienced extemporaneous prayer. I had wanted just to “talk to God” but had never been shown how. I was introduced to Christian books (I had never known Christian bookstores existed until then) and read exciting stories of courageous men and women of faith, like David Wilkerson (The Cross and the Switchblade) and Brother Andrew (God’s Smuggler). I wanted to be like them, giving my life for God. Finally, I had found something I had been searching for — people who boldly lived the faith they professed.

My parents had not been happy with my foray into Young Life, not understanding why I didn’t want to go to our Lutheran youth group. After three years with Young Life, however, I did not sense the depth of the faith I was seeking. I couldn’t define it at the time, but it seemed to me “just not enough.” By my senior year, as I prepared to attend a Lutheran college, I felt compelled to return to our Lutheran church youth group (the “bloom where you’re planted” idea). I had one goal for my life now: to find God, to know Him and love Him, and to give my life to Him. I wanted to be a missionary, but it appeared the only way for a woman in the LCMS to do that was to marry one.

To a Lutheran, the Word of God is of primary importance. It is one of the two “means of grace” (the means by which God creates and increases faith in us); the other being the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, or Holy Communion. I reasoned if I wanted the heroic faith I yearned for, I must commit to studying God’s Word. In Lutheran colleges, though, that track was found in “theology,” not Bible study. The only reasonable course to follow, in my mind then, was to study theology. The only career option for women at that time which called for a theology major was deaconess.

The long search

Theological studies were a huge disappointment. None of it was about the personal relationship with God I sought, only intellectual talk about God, and much of it called into question the foundational Christian truths I had been taught. Despite its noble-sounding motto — “Faith and Service in Christ” — the deaconess preparation program was my first encounter with feminism; serving the feminist cause, not Christ. I sought immersion in life with God, but was being groomed toward breaking open the male-only ministry in the LCMS to include women. The LCMS fractured while I was in college. The conservative faction, which retained the name LCMS, still has only male pastors today. The “liberal” faction later merged with other Lutheran groups to form the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), which ordains women as pastors and bishops. Upon graduation from a Lutheran university with degrees in theology and Greek, I hadn’t come any closer to finding God but, rather, was left very discouraged and confused about what to do.

My search for God continued for several years through a series of church occupations: a deaconess internship (after which I abandoned the whole deaconess track), director of Christian education in a

Lutheran church, and then a Lutheran schoolteacher. I looked for God in Israel pursuing graduate studies and later as an elementary school teacher in Jerusalem. I was impressed by many of the Catholic shrines in the Holy Land, particularly the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem which encloses the traditional sites of our Lord’s Crucifixion, burial, and Resurrection. The beauty of it all left a deep impression on me, but I didn’t yet have a context for appreciating Catholic history or worship.

Back in the U.S., I worked for the LCMS in mission education, traveling around the country promoting LCMS missions. This work took me around the country and even to Nigeria. The beauty and simplicity of the Nigerian people and their worship touched me deeply. Here, I sensed I was getting a little closer to God.

Paving the road

During these years of searching for God, I had several encounters with “real Catholics.” I had not thought Catholics were “real Christians;” I thought they just went to church because they “had to” but did not have “saving faith.” During that time, though, I met some Catholics who made me question this presumption. One was a woman whom I had known as a child in our Lutheran church. She had converted to Catholicism and told me about her devotion to Mary (I was not ready for that!). Her story was the first I had heard in which someone converted to Catholicism out of conviction, not just for marriage.

Another was a Catholic fellow I dated for a while who took me to my first Mass. Something struck me at that Mass, although I didn’t know what. I wanted to go back, again and again, and even attended a few classes with the priest who gave me my first book on Catholicism, Believing in Jesus. I was dumbfounded reading through that book — there was so much in there that I believed! But there was also much I couldn’t touch yet and so I set it aside. Looking back, I can see how the Holy Spirit was paving the road for my own conversion through these encounters with faithful Catholics.

First light

So I continued in the Lutheran Church, married, and had children. I was content enough with the Lutheran church where we lived, which was certainly on the “orthodox” end of the Lutheran spectrum and with a solid liturgy. I was occupied with family matters that my burning quest for the deeper things of God was tempered.

But then, shortly before our third son’s birth, we moved to the town where my testimony began. My husband, Joe, and I were very uncomfortable with the local LCMS church from the beginning. The Baptist-style services and preaching tended in the opposite direction of the orthodox Lutheranism we knew, but we weren’t in the position to go looking elsewhere at that point. However, our experience on “Reformation Sunday,” not only catapulted us out of that church, it eventually landed us in the arms of the Roman Catholic Church. More on that journey later, but now I’d like to address some of the difficult theological issues that had to be overcome before I could embrace Catholicism.

Luther and his doctrines

The Catholic book Joe checked out of the library dealt with the cornerstone of Lutheranism. To have the doctrine sola fide (“faith alone”) fall, meant Luther’s foundation was fatally fractured. What I had learned and held as a Lutheran came crashing down when I squarely faced what the Bible said about faith and works. I had blindly accepted what I had been taught, memorizing “proof texts” for Lutheran doctrines from childhood, never questioning whether or not they actually proved the truths of Lutheran teaching.

Occasionally, it seemed there were inconsistencies between the Bible and Lutheran doctrines; for instance, the doctrine of sola Scriptura (“Bible alone”) came in conflict with New Testament passages. I had trouble reconciling the doctrine of “faith alone” with James’ passages on the importance of works (but we had learned that Luther had called the Book of James “an epistle of straw,” so we didn’t hold it very highly either). However, there was another inconsistency: who was Luther to say what should and should not be in the Bible? That thought was pretty close to blasphemy, I was sure, so I dismissed it.

We had never been taught any church history between the time of the apostles and Luther. I first heard of the “Church Fathers” in a Greek class in college. As I translated Irenaeus’ writings from the Greek, the truth of what he had written amazed me. I wondered why I had never been told of him before. None of my theology courses in college ever mentioned the Church Fathers. We were never given any devotional readings beyond what Luther wrote. I did begin to read some of Luther’s larger works in college and was indeed troubled by his anti-Semitism and hatred of the papacy and Catholic Church. However, that was explained away by saying, “that’s how people wrote and spoke in that time” and “he was German” (and having been raised in a very German family, Luther’s “German” personality made sense to me).

Now, after “Reformation Day,” I faced a book that challenged the most fundamental of all Lutheran doctrines. I shut the book hard several times, afraid of what I was reading. “If this is true,” I surmised, “everything I have believed in my whole life as a Lutheran is in question. If this is true, what else have I wrongly believed?” I did finish the book and I was scared. I was embarking upon the greatest adventure of learning of my life.

I happened upon an online Catholic forum, which became my greatest help for understanding Catholic doctrine in the context of my Lutheran understanding. In these early days of probing Catholicism, I first thought we, as Lutherans and Catholics, were all talking about the same thing, just in a different way. We all believe in justification by faith, but emphasize different aspects.
The biggest shock for me came when I learned that the Catholic Church does not teach, as Lutherans do, that man is totally corrupted through Original Sin, totally incapable of cooperating with God in any way, that God only covers our sins, or that when God looks at us, He does not see us but only Christ.

I was also confronted by something that has taken me years to grasp, and still I am afraid I cannot explain the Catholic doctrine of justification well. It is not simple or single-stranded, but involves the doctrines of sin (original and actual, mortal and venial), grace (actual and sanctifying), the sacraments (all seven), and runs so deep it can never be fully grasped. What confronted me was a completely new, non-linear way of thinking. I would have to empty myself of everything Lutheran and learn the Catholic Faith on its own, not in comparison or in relation to anything I had known as a Lutheran.

I was beginning to see Catholicism not as a set of doctrines, as I had understood the Lutheran faith, but more like a tapestry where every thread of truth is bound up with all the others: pull out one thread and the whole thing unravels; held together, you have a magnificent picture. I had begun with thinking I just needed to translate my Lutheran understanding into Catholic language, but I was looking for cognates in a language where there were none. This was going to be much more like learning Hebrew than Greek.

If I admitted that the Catholic Church was right on justification, which would be borne out in its consistency in all other doctrines, I believed I was compelled to become Catholic. The scandal of Christian disunity deeply troubled me. The least, and best, I could do would be to join the Church Christ Himself founded. But how to get from here to there was nowhere clear to me.

More light on the path

The next book my husband brought home from the college library was Rome Sweet Home by Scott and Kimberly Hahn. I could not believe what I was reading! Here were real people, devout and educated Protestants, who chose to become Catholic. They addressed many of the common Protestant obstacles to the Catholic Church in ways that made sense. I was starting to get an inkling of the process of conversion.

I couldn’t talk to any non-Catholics (which included all my family and friends at the time) about my Catholic musings, because I could not yet explain it. I had no words, no defenses, no context for any of it. I wouldn’t know how to answer their objections, but just knew in my heart I had come upon the Truth. The most I could say was what I had told a Lutheran pastor who asked before we joined his church, “What are you looking for in a church?” I replied, “I am looking for a church that will help me live as a Christian and die as a Christian.” All I could say to my horrified Protestant family and friends was, “I have found the Church I’ve been seeking.”

I continued reading and asking questions of my online Catholic friends. I devoured convert stories and somehow got connected with the Coming Home Network International, probably through the online Catholic forum I had found. CHNetwork provided me with a wonderful mentor, a woman who was formerly a Lutheran pastor. I will be forever thankful to her and CHNetwork for the help I received on my journey to the Catholic Church.

My husband did not yet share my enthusiasm for the Catholic Church and I had to learn that while we were one in marriage, God has His plans for us as individuals. He calls us and works with us according to our individual natures and only God knows the time and manner that is best for that call. It was certainly a challenging time for our marriage, but I know even these struggles were part of God’s way of preparing us both to enter the Catholic Church.

The Last Frontier

A couple years later, we moved again, this time to Alaska, now with four children, having added a daughter eight months earlier. I had continued my Catholic reading and correspondence and was growing more restless about continuing in the Lutheran church. My restlessness came to a head when I began planning for the new school year.

We had begun homeschooling two years earlier when our eldest child was in the third grade. Raising our children in the Christian faith was the central tenet of our home school and choosing the right religion curriculum was the first thing on my teacher’s to-do list each year. I looked over the Lutheran books in front of me and compared them with some Catholic curriculum a Catholic friend from our former homeschool group had shared with me. I was a convinced Catholic by this point and could not in good conscience teach our children what I did not believe. I chose the Catholic curriculum.

Another dilemma presented itself: I would be teaching the Catholic faith to our children while we still worshipped in the Lutheran Church. I talked with my husband and said I could not have one foot in the Lutheran Church and the other in the Catholic Church. Our children needed to have a consistent message. We agreed that day to begin attending the Catholic Church with the view toward becoming Catholic.

Learning to be Catholic

Deciding to become Catholic was one thing; learning how to be Catholic would be something quite different. Actually realizing what we sought — that is to enter the Catholic Church fully and completely — proved a very difficult journey, fraught with many obstacles. Perhaps ironically, this is one thing I appreciated about the Catholic Church: that it’s so hard to get in! It seemed the devil was very interested in keeping us out, so we must be on the right track, I surmised. Looking back over my journey to the Catholic Church, I can see God’s love and providence in allowing every obstacle, every challenge, along the way. How true it is that the harder we work for something, the more we appreciate it!

The first thing I did to learn “how to be Catholic” was to begin a Catholic prayer life. I purchased Manual of Prayers and began an early morning routine of prayer and reading, rising before my family was up. I believe this was the single most important step I took on my journey to Catholicism. After I found a pamphlet on praying the rosary in our church’s “tract rack,” I started taking it with me on my daily “prayer walks,” forcing myself to memorize the prayers and mysteries. It was hard to warm up to this devotion, I admit, but convinced of its importance to the Catholic life, I persevered. By the time I had memorized all the mysteries, I found I was looking forward to my daily rosary. I have received so much consolation and help through praying the rosary that now I can’t imagine a day without it.

In the fall of 2001, my husband and I enrolled in RCIA to begin the process of formal reception into the Catholic Church. Unfortunately, RCIA proved to be a trial rather than an aid on the way; not at all what I envisioned the Catholic Church to be. We endured it, went to Mass faithfully, and began preparing our 10-year-old son, Gabe, for his First Holy Communion. Our priest gave us permission to prepare Gabe at home using the materials I had purchased for our homeschool. This turned out to be a great way for me to learn about the Catholic Faith as we studied together. Gabe became the first “official” Catholic in our family when he received the Sacraments of Penance and Holy Communion the following spring.

Though my husband and I had completed RCIA, we had another obstacle to overcome before we could enter the Church; we needed to have our marriage blessed and for that we would both need to seek annulments of prior unions. The annulment process took two and a half years. Many criticize the Catholic Church’s annulment process. I am not one of them. It is a gift the Church gave us that provided tremendous healing. It required great patience to endure incomprehensible delays with no guarantee of a positive outcome. It afforded a great opportunity for growing through prayer and study, learning what it means to be Catholic. In the end, our annulments were granted and our marriage was blessed at a beautiful ceremony with our children and Catholic friends around us. The following Sunday, my husband (who chose “Augustine” as his Confirmation saint) and I (“Mary, Queen of All Saints” — why not go for the gold?) received the Sacraments of Confirmation and Holy Communion.

I am amazed at how God works! I am thankful for my solid Lutheran upbringing that first brought me to faith and taught me the Scriptures. Growing up Lutheran, I gained a great foundation in and appreciation for sacred music, something I probably would have missed in the Catholic Church during that time (I was raised in a conservative Christian church at the time the Catholic Church was undergoing its “identity crisis” following Vatican II). Now our family is assisting our Catholic parish with its sacred music ministry.

I join so many others God has called out of strong Protestant churches and into the Catholic Church who are now realizing the fullness of the Faith. When I first met with our priest telling him of my desire to become Catholic, I told him I believed I would be bringing many more with me. That remains my hope and I pray daily for my extended family, that they, too, will realize the fullness of the Faith.

My search is over. I have enough — more than enough to last my lifetime!

Advice for those on the way to becoming Catholic

Begin a Catholic prayer life as soon as you are convinced you are on the way to the Catholic Church. Get a “lifetime” prayer book like Manual of Prayers and make this a habit for the rest of your life.

If you are married to a non-Catholic spouse, recognize that although you are one flesh in marriage, you remain individuals spiritually. God does not call couples; He calls individuals. Your call is not your spouse’s call. Be patient with yourself and with your spouse. Pray, pray, pray! Let God do the work of conversion in you both.

Young Nepali Hindus becoming Catholic to stop discrimination

$
0
0
More and more children and teenagers are converting to Catholicism "tired" of inequality and abuses by Hindus on the lower castes and the poor. Twenty young people attend catechism at Kathmandu's Assumption Cathedral. "I want to become Catholic to spread the message of God's equality," said 12-year-old Diko.

Kathmandu (AsiaNews) - In Nepal, many young Hindus and Buddhists are choosing to become Catholic because of deep-seated inequality and discrimination. "I saw with my own eyes whole groups prohibited from entering Hindu temples just because they were from the lower castes," Diko Tamang, 12, told AsiaNew. "These people could not offer prayers; it is an unforgivable discrimination." From a Hindu family, Diko attends catechism at Kathmandu's Assumption Cathedral, along with a group of some 20 boys and girls.

"In my opinion," he said, "there should be no discrimination of any kind in a religion. In Christianity, there are none. In all castes and ethnic groups, each person is treated the same way. This is what I like and what inspired me to become Catholic. When I grow up I want to be able to spread the message of God's equality in our society."

Rita Maharjan, 18, also goes catechism with Diko. "I came here," she told AsiaNews, at the invitation of my sister, who is Catholic. For a long time, she had serious health problems, paralysed in the legs, unable to walk. We spent a lot of money to treat her. One day one of her friends encouraged her to go to church and be blessed by the priest. She did, and a few weeks later she was healed. When I tell this, a lot of people do not believe me, but it is true and I can testify to God's power and grace on my sister. I want to become Catholic, tell people about my experience and feel the grace of the Lord."


Nepal is home to about 150,000 Christians, including 8,000 Catholics. Before the fall of the monarchy (2006), Hinduism was the state religion, affecting the lives of every citizen. Following the proclamation of a secular state, religious freedom was guaranteed; yet minorities, especially Christians, are still subjected to harassment and threats from the majority community.

Hindus are often involved in discrimination, violence against women and marginalisation of the poor. In turn, they, and sometimes Buddhists, accuse Catholics and other Christians of converting people by force or by offering them money.

The kids attending catechism disagree. "When we came to the church no one asked us to convert. No one attempted to bribe us with something. We were interested and asked the priest to convert us, but he refused. He told us to ask our parents for permission and to study well what Christianity is."

From his first lessons, Diko remembers "people who studied the doctrine's teachings for over two years to become Catholic. To be Christian and ask for baptism we have to study."

Nepal's non-Christian population is steadily increasing. At the same time, the Catholic community is also steadily growing. This, experts say, depends on a long-term process that allows converts not to stray from their chosen course.

INQUIRER on INC: "Felix Manalo who founded the congregation in 1914"

$
0
0
NEWS FACT: Jesus didn't found the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) as what they claim. Here's what our Philippine Local News say about the sect:

"Felix Manalo who founded the congregation [INC] in 1914." Philippine Daily Inquirer Online

"Iglesia ni Cristo, which is believed to have about three million members, held the event ostensibly as a medical and charity mission, with its followers giving aid to residents of huge slums.

"...Founded by Felix Manalo in 1914, Iglesia ni Cristo exerts huge political influence in the Philippines."

Read more: Phil. Inquirer Online

Image of Felix Manalo, founder of the sect Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) formerly registered as Iglesia ni Kristo (INK) in 1914

Are they 'Christians'? (Kristiano ba sila?)

$
0
0

Provers 24:17-18Rejoice not when your enemy falls, and when he stumbles, let not your heart exult, Lest the LORD see it, be displeased with you, and withdraw his wrath from your enemy. - Holy Scriptures

Base sa nakalap na source ng blog na ito si Jeannette Ramos Vallejos ay nakatira sa Pasay City, isang kaanib ng Iglesia ni Cristong tatag ni Felix Manalo, nag-aaral siya sa New Era University, anak ni Ermie Vallejos Sr, isang ministro at ni Regina Vallejos. based from a source, she is a resident of Pasay City, an Iglesia ni Cristo who studied in New Era University, daughter of Ermie.

Source: Tripod

AP News: Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) was FOUNDED by Felix Manalo (not Christ)!

$
0
0
Source: AP News/ PDI:

More than 1.5 million people converged here Monday for a powerful Christian sect’s evangelical event, causing traffic chaos that shut down large parts of the megacity.

The gathering of the secretive and politically influential Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ) in the historic district of Manila forced all schools and some government offices to close.

...Iglesia ni Cristo, which is believed to have about three million members, held the event ostensibly as a medical and charity mission, with its followers giving aid to residents of huge slums.

... Founded by Felix Manalo in 1914, Iglesia ni Cristo exerts huge political influence in the Philippines.
SUMMARY: The Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) is a sect (not a religion), it's secretive and political (not religious), it has about 3 million members only (not more than 10 million as they want us to believe) and was FOUNDED by Felix Manalo in 1914 (not Christ as they want us to believe)!

That's according to international Associated Press (AP) News!

INC Chapel in Burnaby,British Columbia, Canada. Despite its location where people speaks English and French, this sect keeps its Registration Trademark Iglesia ni Cristo just like any other commercialized establishments or business products protected by Patents and Trademark Laws. INC is a corporation owned and managed by the Manalo clan from Philippines.

Pope Francis is World's No. 4 Most Powerful Man on Earth

$
0
0
According to Forbes, Pope Francis is the fourth most powerful man on earth.

1 Vladimir Putin; Russian President (3)

2 Barack Obama; US President (1)

3 Xi Jinping; General Secretary of China’s Communist Party (9)

4 Pope Francis; Supreme Pontiff (NA)

5 Angela Merkel; German Chancellor (2)

6 Bill Gates; Co-chair Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (4)

7 Ben Bernanke; US Federal Reserve Chairman (6)

8 Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud; King, Saudi Arabia (7)

9 Mario Draghi; European Central Bank President (8)

10 Michael Duke; Wal-Mart CEO (17)

Sabi ng mga kaanib ng Iglesia ni Cristo nakalagay daw sa Biblia na "naitalikod" ang Unang Iglesia!

$
0
0
Comment from here
On the contrary, here is OFFICIALLY published in their PASUGO found at KATOTOHANAN TUNGKOL SA IGLESIA NI KRISTO 1914.

PASUGO Mayo 1968, p. 5:
"Ano ang katangian ng maging Tupa ni Cristo? Sa Juan 10:28 ay ganito ang sabi: 'At sila'y binigyan ko ng walang hanggang buhay, at kailanma'y hindi sila malilipol, at hindi aagawin ng sinuman sa aking kamay'. Isang dakilang kapalaran ang maging Tupa o Tauhan ni Cristo sapagkat sila'y binibigyan niya ng walang hanggang buhay at hindi sila malilipol kailan man."

Idaragdag natin dito ang talata 29, bilang susog sa talatang 28 na ginagamit nila, at ganito ang karugtong:

(29) "Ang aking Ama (wika niJesus), na sa kanila ay nagbigay sa akin ay lalong dakila kaysa lahat; at hindi sila maaagaw ninuman sa kamay ng Ama." Ito bang nasusulat na ito sa kanilang PASUGO ay mabubura pa nila? Gayon din itong garantiyang sinasabi ni Jesus hinggil [sa] mga magiging tauhan niya? At higit pa bang paniniwalaan natin itong mga maling aral!

At bilang kalakip nito ay sisikapin pa natin ang isang banggit na nasusulat sa PASUGO Hunyo 1940, p. 27:

"Papaano ang pag-aalaga at pag-iingat sa pananampalataya? Wala tayong dapat gawin kundi manatili sa mga aral ng Dios na ating napag-aralan. Ito ang ginawa ng unang Iglesia. Sila'y nanatiling matibay sa aral ng mga Apostol. Ganito rin ang dapat nating gawin."
Since they mentioned about the EARLY CHURCH, what do you think is the real church among the many churches today claiming to be "real" who has historical link to this FIRST CENTURY CHURCH and whom thier Ministers said "REMAINED STEADFAST" in their faith?

Let's copy from Iglesia ni Cristo's (1914) official magazine called PASUGO:

PASUGO July August 1988 pp. 6.
“Even secular history shows a direct time link between the Catholic Church and the Apostles, leading to the conclusion that the true Church of Christ is the Catholic Church.”

PASUGO Abril 1966, p. 46:

“Ang Iglesia Katolika na sa pasimula ay siyang Iglesia ni Cristo."

So we are the EARLY CHURCH!
We never apostatized and we remained steadfast in our faith.. this you INC members should do as suggested by your minister writer.
So we rest our case!
Thank you PASUGO!


POPE FRANCIS: Man of the Year 2013

$
0
0

(CNN) -- Time named Pope Francis its person of the year Wednesday after nine months of a papacy that has brought accolades from reformers, raised fears among conservatives, and drawn widespread adulation from people around the world for his man-of-the-people ways.

"He took the name of a humble saint and then called for a church of healing," Time wrote in its announcement. "The septuagenarian superstar is poised to transform a place that measures change by the century."

Attention Iglesia ni Cristo 1914: Did the Emperor Constantine Found the Catholic Church?

The Cult of Manalo and the True Church: Centennial Edition

$
0
0

This informative book will be made available in bookstores nationwide during the Centennial celebration of the INC of Manalo this coming July 27, 2014. Please like the page in Facebook: Exposing the Iglesia ni Cristo for update. Thanks for the efforts done by our unmoved faith-filled CFD's (Catholic Faith Defenders).

Catholic Defender Wishes you a very Merry Christmas!

The central claim of Christianity is that God became one of us 2000 years ago

$
0
0


Prophetic writings several hundred years before His birth called Him Mighty God, Prince of Peace, Mighty Counselor, Father Forever, God With Us. He referred to Himself as the Way, the Truth, the Life. St. Paul said that in Him we live, and move, and have our being. -NewAdvent Blog

Pope Francis drew 6.6 million to the Vatican in 2013, three times Benedict

$
0
0

Pope Francis (Source: EricGarland.co)
VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - More than 6.6 million people attended events with Pope Francis at the Vatican from his election in March to the end of 2013, figures released on Thursday showed, compared to 2.3 million for former Pope Benedict in all of 2012.

The Vatican said the figures were based on the number of tickets issued for papal events where they are needed, such as general audiences, Masses and private audiences.

They were also based on estimates of the number of people at events where tickets are not needed, such as his weekly appearance from a window overlooking St. Peter's Square.

The Vatican did not issue comparative figures on Thursday but figures released on Jan. 4, 2013 showed that some 2.3 million people attended all events presided by Benedict in 2012.

Benedict, citing health reasons, resigned on Feb. 28, 2013, becoming the first pope in 600 years to do so rather than ruling for life. He is now known as Pope Emeritus.

Figures released last month which were limited to the number of people who attended weekly general audiences showed that Francis had drawn around four times as many people in about nine-and-a-half months of 2013 than Benedict had in all of 2012. Francis was elected on March 13, 2013.

Francis, who last month was named Person of the Year by Time Magazine, has drawn people to the Vatican because of his outgoing, simple and friendly style. Benedict was more reserved and far less spontaneous.

The first non-European pope in 1,300 years, he took over an institution rocked by sex abuse and other scandals, and losing faithful to other religions.

Reinvigorating the church, he has forsaken many of the trappings used by his predecessors. He gave up the spacious papal apartments in the Apostolic Palace for a small apartment in a guest house and is driven in a regular car instead of the papal limousine.

Francis has also proven to be popular because of his statements urging the Church to be closer to the poor and to be more merciful and less condemning.

The Vatican said the figures released on Thursday did not include the crowds that turned out to see the pope during his trips to Brazil, and to Assisi and Lampedusa in Italy.

More than 3 million people attended the pope's final event of the Brazil trip on Copacabana Beach in Rio de Janeiro on July 28.

The crowds at Francis' general audiences and Sunday addresses have often topped 100,000, forcing police to close off the boulevard leading to the Vatican to accommodate more people.

Tickets to audiences and Masses are issued for free by the Vatican's Prefecture of the Pontifical Household and usually distributed through parishes and Church institutions. — Reuters

DECEIVERS of the FAITH: The IGLESIA NI CRISTO!

$
0
0
NAKAKATAWA AT NAKAKAAWA ITONG MGA CATHOLIC "DEFENDER""DAW" NA ITO, HINDI NA YATA PINAGISIPAN AT HINDI YATA TALAGA NAGISIP.I'M NOT AGAINTS DUN SA TALAGANG MABUBUTI AT MABABAIT AT MATITINO NAMAN TALAGANG KATOLIKO. ANG TINUTUKOY KO AY YUNG CATHOLIC DEFENDER "DAW" NA TALAGANG HINDI YATA MALIGAYA NG HINDI MASISIRA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO. NAPAKAINIT NG DUGO NILA SA IGLESIA NI CRISTO. KUNG KELAN 100 YEARS NA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO, TSAKA PA KAYO NAGLABAS NG GANYAN BOOK?? PARA ANU?? PARA SIRAIN, TIBAGIN, DURUGIN, OR GIBAIN ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO SA AKALA NINYO? ETO LANG MASASABI NAMIN, HINDI NA NINYO KAMI KAYANG GIBAIN, SIRAAN NYO NA KAMI NANG SIRAAN, PERO MAIIWAN NA LANG KAYO JAN. ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO HABANG SINISIRA, LALONG SUMUSULONG AT NAKAKAGULAT ANG NAGIGING TAGUMPAY. KUNG NUON NGA NA NAGUUMPISA PA LANG SA PANGANGARAL SI KA FELIX, SINIRAAN NYO NA , HINAMAK AT INUSIG NYO, NATINAG BA, OR BUMAGSAK BA ANG IGLESIA?? NUONG NAMATAY ANG KA FELIX, NAGDIWANG KAYO ANG SABI NYO, WALA NA SI KA FELIX BABAGSAK NA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO, NANGYARI BA?? NAGPA DYARYO PA KAYO NG KUNG ANU ANUNG PANINIRA, NAGIBA BA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO. UULITIN KO HINDI NA NINYO KAMI KAYANG GIBAIN, TUNAY ANG DIYOS NAMIN!! NGAYON PA NA 100 YEARS NA ANG IGLESIA AT NASA 105 BANSA NA SA BUONG MUNDO TSAKA PA KAYO NAGLABAS NG GANYAN LIBRO?? IT'S NONSENCE!!! WALANG SILBI YAN!! NONSENCE!! NAGSASAYANG LANG KAYO NG PANAHON AT PERA PARA JAN, NA KAYO DIN ANG MAPAPAHIYA. MAGISIP NAMAN KAYO.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAKAKATAWA AT NAKAKAAWA ITONG MGA CATHOLIC "DEFENDER""DAW" NA ITO, HINDI NA YATA PINAGISIPAN AT HINDI YATA TALAGA NAGISIP.I'M NOT AGAINTS DUN SA TALAGANG MABUBUTI AT MABABAIT AT MATITINO NAMAN TALAGANG KATOLIKO. ANG TINUTUKOY KO AY YUNG CATHOLIC DEFENDER "DAW" NA TALAGANG HINDI YATA MALIGAYA NG HINDI MASISIRA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO. 

 Ginoong Emerson, nakakatawa ba kamo? Pero affected ka!  

Kaming mga Catholic Defenders ay NAG-IISIP po bago namin inilalabas ang aming mga komento.  Ang aming mga sites at mga BLOGS ay HINDI po ito tinuturing na "Official  Sites" bagama't mayroon kaming mga LINKS na pwede mong i-cross reference kung sakaling duda ka sa mga assertions  namin. At opo official websites po ang aming mga references.

Eh kayo OPISYAL na nilalathala! Mantakin niyo ang mga ministro, HINDI PINAG-IISIPAN ang kanilang sinusulat at sinasabi bago nila OPISYAL na ilathala sa print, radyo o video.


PEKENG PARI NAUTO NG MGA MANALO! from The Splendor on Vimeo.

Anong sabi ng nag-upload ng video?

This was aired in the Television Channel (Net25) of Iglesia ni Cristo, a religious corporation originated in the Philippines on 1914. This is about the what they so called a "PRIEST" from "IGLESIA KATOLIKA" (CATHOLIC CHURCH) who has been their convert for some reason. But for the benefit of the faithful Catholic out there.. Christopher Yu is NOT A ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST which is actually what the VIDEO is INSINUATING. He is from a particular CULT in the Philippines that named their ORGANIZATION as APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC CHURCH.

I just hope that the INC became more sensitive regarding this issue so they wont get misinterpreted by their viewers (if they really cared for the TRUTH) and some Catholic out there who are ignorant of their Faith.
This video is own by Net25. No copy rights intended.

YOU ARE DECEIVING your own kind!

Kayo ang MALIGAYA sa PANLOLOKO at PANLILINLANG para maraming aanib sa pekeng INCorporated Church? Ikaw pinag-isipan mo ba ang mga sinasabi mo?!
NAPAKAINIT NG DUGO NILA SA IGLESIA NI CRISTO. KUNG KELAN 100 YEARS NA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO, TSAKA PA KAYO NAGLABAS NG GANYAN BOOK?? PARA ANU?? PARA SIRAIN, TIBAGIN, DURUGIN, OR GIBAIN ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO SA AKALA NINYO? 

Ginoong Emerson, dapat kami ang magtatanong niyan eh... BAKIT NGA BA ANG INIT NG DUGO NIYO SA MGA KATOLIKO?

Baka naman isipin mo na haka-haka lamang ang aking sinasabi rito.  Hindi po. OPISYAL pong sinabi ng inyong ministro na KAYO ANG GALIT sa aming mga Katoliko.  

PASUGO Oktubre 1956, p. 1:
“Ang Iglesia ni Cristo ay nagdaos ng pamamahayag sa Lunsod ng Davao. Nagsalita roon si Kapatid na Felix Manalo at ang kasama niyang mga Ministro. Ipinahayag doon ng mga nagsalita na ang Iglesia Katolika Romana ay hindi itinatag ni Cristo kundi itinatag ng Diablo."

Kitam! Panahon pa ng inyong pekeng sugo eh PINANGANGARAL na niya ang PAGKAMUHI sa Iglesia Katolika na "sa pasimula ay siyang [tunay] na Iglesia ni Cristo" ayon sa inyong PASUGO Abril 1966, pahina 46.

At halata yatang IKAW ang HINDI NAG-IISIP.  Hindi mo ba alam na noong 91 years pa lang kayo ay naglabas ng aklat si ROSE TIPON na pinamagatang "The Power and Glory: The Cult of Manalo"at ano ang ginawa ng INC Central?  Hiniling nila sa Korte na pagbawalan ang paglabas ng aklat!

At nagbanta pa na kapag ilalabas daw ito ay magkakagulo ang bansa?!! Talaga?!

Ano yon, BLACKMAILING at INTIMIDATION TACTICS?

Hindi po uubra sa amin yan... kaya kung may ilalabas kaming aklat man patungkol sa inyong PEKENG IGLESIA ay sana huwag niyong harangin. Hayaan niyo itong mabasa ng lahat ng Pinoy para maliwanagan sila kung ang INC ni Manalo ba ay tunay o hindi!

At kayo ba sa INCorporated Church of Manalo, bakit niyo SINISIRAAN ang Iglesia Katolika sa Pasugo, radio, TV, YouTube at website?  Para "TIBAGIN, DURUGIN, OR GIBAIN" Iglesia Katolika?

Mamamatay si Eduardo Manalo pero HINDI matitibag o  madudurog o magigiba ang tunay na IGLESIA NI CRISTO-- ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA! Mahigit 2,000 taon na po kami at aarangkada sa IKATLONG MILENIYO! 

Kayo 100 taon pa lang!

ETO LANG MASASABI NAMIN, HINDI NA NINYO KAMI KAYANG GIBAIN, SIRAAN NYO NA KAMI NANG SIRAAN, PERO MAIIWAN NA LANG KAYO JAN. ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO HABANG SINISIRA, LALONG SUMUSULONG AT NAKAKAGULAT ANG NAGIGING TAGUMPAY. KUNG NUON NGA NA NAGUUMPISA PA LANG SA PANGANGARAL SI KA FELIX, SINIRAAN NYO NA , HINAMAK AT INUSIG NYO, NATINAG BA, OR BUMAGSAK BA ANG IGLESIA?? 

Hungkag!  Baka naman ang tinutukoy mo ay ang IGLESIA ni CRISTO na TUNAY-- ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA.

Sino ba ang tinutukoy mong gustong gumiba sa inyo kundi ang inyong apong si Eliseo Soriano na galing sa inyong hanay?  Tanging ang ANG DATING DAAN ang gustong sumira sa inyo. Kaya nga nagkakasakitan na kayo at nagpapatayan dahil diyan.. huwag niyo kaming idamay sa inyong hallucinations!

Kami ang INUSIG mula pa sa panahon ng mga ROMANO, mga hari, reyna, prinsepe, prinsesa, presidente, bansa, ideolohiya, rightists, leftists, agnostics, atheists, protestants, non-christians, islam, etc., pero NANDITO pa rin kami.

Bumagsak ba ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA? Sa katunayan ay LUMALAGO po ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA.  Sa inyong INCorporated church wala man lang kayong maipakitang statistika kung ilan nga ba ang official number of your members? 

Pera?  Oo meron kayo. Nakikita nga! Pero ang tunay na iglesia ay hindi nasusukat sa kung anong bagay ang meron siya. Kung ILANG KALULUWA ang naaakit sa kanya at kung ilan ang mga NAMATAY alang-alang sa pananampalataya at iglesiang ito!

Ikaw, handa ka bang mamatay para sa pagtatanggol sa REGISTERED INC ng mga Manalo?

NUONG NAMATAY ANG KA FELIX, NAGDIWANG KAYO ANG SABI NYO, WALA NA SI KA FELIX BABAGSAK NA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO, NANGYARI BA?? NAGPA DYARYO PA KAYO NG KUNG ANU ANUNG PANINIRA, NAGIBA BA ANG IGLESIA NI CRISTO. UULITIN KO HINDI NA NINYO KAMI KAYANG GIBAIN,

Nagkakape ka pa ba? Di ka na marunong nerbiyosin sa mga sinasabi mo.

Kami ba ay "NAGDIRIWANG" sa tuwing may namamatay?  Saan? Kailan? Magpakita ka nga ng kahit isang link man lang o news clip na nagsasaya ang mga Katoliko nang namatay ang inyong pekeng sugo?

On the contrary, kayong mga kaanib ng kulto ni Manalo ang NAGDIWANG at NAGSAYA noong nasalanta ang Tacloban City ng bagyo.

 
Halos lahat kayong mga INC sa netsphere ay iisa lang ang inyong tono, mapa-forum man ito o individual post sa Facebook. Maging ang sikat na sikat na blog ng inyong kaanib na si CONRAD J. OBLIGACION na may ari ng www.resbak.com at http://readmeinc.blogspot.com ay HINDI man lang nag-komento laban sa kanilang mga kaanib na NAGDIWANG at NAGPAPASALAMAT pa sa "dios nila" sa sinapit ng mga tao sa Tacloban... at nanalangin pang mamatay na lahat ng mga Katoliko sa mundo.

Hindi ko lang uulitin, gusto kong ISAMPAL sa mukha mo ito! Kailanman ay HINDING-HINDI magigiba ang IGLESIA KATOLIKA na sa pasimula pa ay siyang IGLESIA NI CRISTO. Bakit kamo? Sapagkat si CRISTO ang nangako...

Magtayo man kayo ng REGISTERED TRADEMARK na IGLESIA NI CRISTO pero mananatili itong PEKE, HUWAD na iglesia.

Ito ang ilagay mo sa iyong notebook: Sa pagdating ng 100 year anniversary niyo, BUONG BALITA mapa-local man o international ay magsasabing:  FELIX MANALO FOUNDED the IGLESIA NI CRISTO!!!

TUNAY ANG DIYOS NAMIN!! NGAYON PA NA 100 YEARS NA ANG IGLESIA AT NASA 105 BANSA NA SA BUONG MUNDO TSAKA PA KAYO NAGLABAS NG GANYAN LIBRO?? IT'S NONSENCE!!! WALANG SILBI YAN!! NONSENCE!! NAGSASAYANG LANG KAYO NG PANAHON AT PERA PARA JAN, NA KAYO DIN ANG MAPAPAHIYA. MAGISIP NAMAN KAYO.

Anong "dios" ba ang meron kayo? 

Wala naman kayong sinasamba kundi ang inyong bagong BAAL na tinawag na INC.

Ni hindi niyo nga itinuturin na Kristiano ang inyong mga kaanib. At anong katawagan niyo sa isa't-isa?


Maging sa inyong mga awitin at pamamahayag ay INC ang pagpapakilala niyo sa isa't-isa?


Awkward namang pakinggan kung sasabihin kong "Ako ay Iglesia Katolika". Maari ko pa sigurong sabihing "Ako ay Katoliko".

Instead, kayo ay nagpapakilalang "iglesia". Anong relihiyon mo? Sagot niyo: "Ako'y iglesia"?

What's your religion? Sagot sa English, "I'm church"? Hahahahaha...

Pero kapag sinabi mong "ako'y iglesia" iisa lang ang ibig sabihin.. yung REGISTERED TRADEMARK na Inc.
 
Kaya't ang inyong bagong "dios" ay ang INC. At ang inyong simbulo ay ang bandila ng Italya. Saan nga ba ito naka-base sa Biblia?

Tahimik ang Central ng Registered INC of Manalo!

Kaya't sa inyong REGULAR na PANINIRA at PAG-UUSIG sa aming mga Katoliko sa TV, Radio, Pasugo, God-s Message Magazines, YouTube at forums, heto ang masasabi namin sa inyo:

WALANG SILBI YAN!! NONSENCE!! NAGSASAYANG LANG KAYO NG PANAHON AT PERA PARA JAN, NA KAYO DIN ANG MAPAPAHIYA. MAGISIP NAMAN KAYO.

In the Middle of a Triangle – Conversion Story of Najib Nasr

$
0
0
Conversion Story from COMING HOME NETWORK

I was baptized Greek Orthodox (after my father) in Lebanon, where I lived the first 60 years of my life. My mother was an Evangelical Christian on account of the American missionaries who came to Lebanon in the early nineteenth century. I read the New Testament once in my teens and thought I knew everything. I ended up living somewhat in ignorance for decades.

I lived a secular existence, going to church only on feast days. I was in the choir at the Evangelical church, but only in the summertime when we would be at our summer place in the mountains overlooking Beirut. That was as far as it went on the religious side. I did lead a chaste life, though, guided by my memory of what I had retained of the Word of God.

My father was an Arabic and history teacher at a boarding school who was home on weekends. My mother was a music teacher and was in Saudi Arabia at the time, tutoring the daughter of the crown prince. The younger of my two sisters took care of me.

Taking flight

Without much guidance, I was a collage freshman dropout from the American University of Beirut (AUB). During my freshman year (1956-57), my physics class was at the School of Agriculture building and I was by the window overlooking the beautiful football field. Planes, including jet fighters, would pass over the radio beacon situated at the AUB swimming beach on their final approach to land at Beirut International Airport. That did it. From that point on, I wanted to become a pilot.

I could not afford to pursue training abroad, so it was a long, pioneering endeavor, waiting for the ground school to open and for the Aero Club of Lebanon (ACL) to commence operations. I started flying in 1961 and was the first made-in-Lebanon, private and commercial pilot; all other pilots studied abroad.

I borrowed on my life policy and got my Assistant Instructor’s Rating from the UK. I later passed my Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) written and flying exams through the American Embassy in Beirut and got all my FAA licenses and eventually took over ACL operations. The ACL was a dead end. By then, I had trained one of my students as a flight instructor and he succeeded me when I joined Middles East Airlines (MEA), next door, as an airline pilot. It was a 27-year rewarding career. I flew Sud Aviation Caravelle 6N, Boeing 707, and 720 and Airbus A310 jet aircraft. I was a Route Training Captain for Trainee First Officers and for Trainee Captains.

I joined MEA in 1972 and married my charming wife, Therese, in 1975. She is a Maronite Catholic. There are twenty-three rites in the Catholic Church; one Roman rite and twenty-two Eastern rite churches. The Maronite Church never split with Rome. [For more information on the different rites in the Catholic Church we suggest you go to EWTN Catholic Rites and churches—Ed.]

Caught in a religious triangle

I started reading the Bible in a serious manner some five years before my mandatory retirement at age sixty. Looking back now, all along, the Holy Spirit has been preparing me. First, I had Mr. Yorkie, a talented American for an English teacher during high school. I turned out to be good at English. I read American books extensively. Then again, my experience as an instructor and the resumption of the reading of Scripture all contributed to what was to come and helped me to reformulate my sense of justice. Philippians 1:6 was being applied in my life: “I am confident of this, that the one who began a good work in you will continue to complete it until the day of Christ Jesus” (I am quoting from the New American Bible for best rendering). Anyway, I could not remember where things were in the Bible, so I gradually developed an 18-page, selected Bible readings index that is unlike any other around.

Circumstances of war and work requirements gradually squeezed us out of Lebanon, and we ended up in America. My family left ten years before I retired, while I left just weeks after retiring in 1999. My second conversion took place in those last weeks. It was the Sunday after Easter, as I attended my first confession ever, during which, without crying, tears came streaming down my face at the thought of lost time away from God. (My first conversion was a pledge I wrote on a Protestant pamphlet a year earlier.)

In the United States, we would attend Sunday Mass at the Roman Catholic Church near our place in Los Angeles or at Our Lady of Mt. Lebanon Maronite Church. Weekdays, I would listen to Protestant pastors on the radio while waiting to pick up one of our three daughters from college. I saw inconsistency in their preaching and, when I realized that there were 33,000+ denominations/churches — to borrow from my training as a pilot — I applied full brakes, like there was not enough runway left! Matthew 16:18-19 figured prominently as the main factor, especially, since Jesus uttered the word “church” in the singular. In my simplicity, I believed Him. Did I do wrong? No way (Matthew 10:16)!

My father was Orthodox, my mother Protestant, and my wife a Catholic. I was in the middle of a religious triangle, and I did not like it one bit. Now, where in the name of heaven was God’s Church? I started a serious search for Her.

Searching for the one Church

The process was time consuming. The hurdle was the stagnation that followed after realizing that there wasn’t enough time in this life to experience all 33,000 Protestant/evangelical/non-denominational entities. After a (Holy Spirit) while, the Catholic Church became my target for investigation, since Peter was in the middle of things there. Of course, no entity can survive without a visible head and an organization to support it. Imagine two first officers flying a jetliner on a regular basis! I reasoned that if we need a head to institute an entity, then we do need a head to keep it going. And Jesus had already chosen to appoint Peter with authority over the Church.

I stumbled on typology (a study that examines the way in which Christian beliefs are prefigured or symbolized by people, places, events, or things in the Old Testament). Jesus employed typology: the “keys” in Matthew 16:19 which refer back to Isaiah 22:22; and Peter also: “let another take his position of overseer” (Acts 1:20 and Psalm 109:8). Next was Apostolic Succession through the laying on of hands: (Numbers 27:18-23; Deuteronomy 34:9; and Hebrews 6:1-2; 1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6).

I read the works of St. Ignatius of Antioch. He was the first on record to have called the Church, the “catholic Church.” So, how was this man connected to the Church that Jesus Christ instituted? The answer was that he was the disciple of the Apostle John and was ordained by Peter. That was the connection that cannot be repudiated, considering that he lived for some 30 to 35 years concurrently with John.

When I perceived that Peter did not write about his travels, nor did John, I saw how God wanted Paul’s endeavors to stand out, but only as a sampling of what was going on. The other Apostles were doing the same. Therefore, I could not expect St. Ignatius to be mentioned in the Bible, nor his colleague in the “School of John,” St. Polycarp. St. Ignatius was the equivalent of Timothy and Titus, an apostolic man whose words help us discover the truth. By God’s providence, we have his writings here with us; his seven letters. [To read these letters, you may do a simple Internet search for “seven letters of St. Ignatius” or purchase a copy of Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp of Symrna: A New Translation and Theological Commentary by Dr. Kenneth Howell, available at www.chresources.com—Ed.]

The Eucharist is present in his early writings (Letter to the Smyrnians 8:1-2); the position of the priest is also present — the Bible mentions the bishop, the deacon, and presbyters (Letter to the Smyrnians 7:1); the Blessed Virgin Mary is present (Letter to the Ephesians 19:1; and Tralles 3:1); the status of the bishop is present (Letter to Trallians 3:1); and, words concerning schisms and reverts are present (Letter to the Philadelphians 3:2).

Again, that did it. When I converted, I had to get my baptismal certificate, because the Catholic Church, in conformity with the Scriptures, recognizes only one baptism and accepts Orthodox and Protestant baptisms if performed in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 4:5). I had no one except my (now deceased) sister in Lebanon to secure a copy of my baptismal certificate. She was much older than I am and would be very upset to know that I was converting. In the Middle East, this thing was just not done. I told her I wanted to be under the Pope. She misunderstood me. The word Baba in Arabic means Pope or father.

The Maronite Catholic Church

I chose to be a Maronite because I considered that the Maronites saved Lebanese Christianity by coming from Northern Syria and evangelizing the rugged Lebanese mountains, thus, eradicating the well entrenched organized pagan worship there, left over by the Christians who had only evangelized the coastline. With access to their ships, the Phoenicians could have spread their religion far and wide. Lebanon meant a lot to the Maronites, and I am of Lebanese descent. It was only natural for me to want to choose the Maronite Church.

Then again, the Maronite liturgy is very rich. There are prayers in a poetic setting, shedding light on the Scriptures from a different angle. The liturgy requires continuous active participation by the faithful. The Liturgy (the Mass) is part of the sacred oral Word (which was there plenty before the written Word). Thus, one gets insights into the revelations of the Holy Spirit to the Apostles. If one pays attention, one comes to realize, for example, that Mary, not just Joseph, is from the House of David; and that Jesus actually laid hands on the Apostles, minutes before His Ascension and did not just raise His hands to bless them, as we may imagine referring to Luke 24:50.

Here in America, I found myself engaged in Catholic apologetics, trying to convert my Protestant cousins back home, in England, in Australia, and here in America. Not succeeding there, I ended up evangelizing Catholics. I wrote numerous apologetics articles in our quarterly magazine and I now give a monthly, 5-minute apologetics presentation to members of our Knights of Columbus council at the Roman Catholic Church near our home in Los Angeles, where I am the sacristan for the Vigil Mass. I also attend daily Mass (Liturgy) at Our Lady of Mt. Lebanon Church.

Detractors or Fact? Local Philippine News again confirms the Iglesia ni Cristo was Founded by Felix Manalo, not Christ

$
0
0
InterAksyon.com
The online news portal of TV5

MANILA, Philippines - A lawmaker on Wednesday filed a bill seeking to rename Commonwealth Avenue in honor of Erano G. Manalo, the late leader of the Iglesia ni Cristo.

Marikina Representative Romero Federico Quimbo said the change of name would be in time for the centennial celebration on July 27 of the sect, whose central office complex, as well as New Era College and New Era General Hospital, are along Commonwealth Avenue.

"Considering that the historical tapestry of Commonwealth Avenue is interwoven with the Iglesia ni Cristo under the dynamic leadership of Ka Erdy, and considering his contribution to nation-building, it is only fitting that Ka Erdy be recognized where his heritage is deeply rooted," according to the explanatory note of House Bill 3673.

The INC was founded by Felix Manalo, father of Erano, on July 27, 1914. [Continue reading here at Interaksion.com]

Soon news around the world will confirm the same... mark my word members of Manalo's Church!

The Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) is a Self-Proclaimed Filipino Church, says the news!

$
0
0
This news says the Iglesia ni Cristo is a FILIPINO CHURCH.  It's new temple has mostly Filipino Migrant Workers-- such that the Minister, the Choir, Deacon and Finance Officer are ALL FILIPINOS.  Lastly the writer knows his facts straightforward:  That the Iglesia ni Cristo is a SELF-PROCLAIMED global church just as their "Last Sugo" was a SELF-PROCLAIMED messiah, messenger and angel superior than Christ who is just merely a man.  News Source: Fresnobee.com (highlights are mine)
Another INC chapel abroad. Notice the logo? Despite the fact that it's in the USA however it RETAINS its Registered Trademark "Iglesia ni Cristo".  Fact is, this INC cannot use its English translation "Church of Christ" independently for breach of patented registered trademarks because there have been numerous registered Churches of Christ prior to the registration of this INC..  The Tagalog registered trademark of it gives the Filipino a hint that this church is the church founded by Felix Manalo in the Philippines in 1914 distinct from the other protestant founded "Church of Christ" within its vicinity. Do not be deceived! This is not a characteristic of a universal church.  This is yet another man-made fake church! -Catholic Defender
A mainly Filipino congregation in a poor neighborhood in central Fresno feels it now has the improved facilities to help others.

For the past 21/2 years, Iglesia ni Cristo (Church of Christ) has held Sunday services and activities in its social hall rather than its sanctuary, which needed major renovation.

The project, including the installation of outdoor double steeples, was recently completed. Services are now held in the sanctuary with new pews, flooring, heating and air-conditioning, sound system and lighting from three large chandeliers. Bathrooms also were remodeled.

Now, the church is planning a Neighborhood Appreciation event in late January.

"The church wants to be involved in outreach," says Norman Dela Cruz, the new church minister. He replaces Max Vito, who was transferred to an Iglesia ni Christo church in Alameda.[Pinoy ang may-ari ng INC]

Iglesia ni Cristo is a self-proclaimed global church with 104 ecclesiastical districts in the Philippines and in 90 more countries and territories. The Fresno church is affiliated with the Iglesia ni Cristo Northern California District, which has 35 churches.

At a recent Sunday service, deacons and deaconesses guided visitors into the sanctuary, where men and women sit on separate sides.

Twenty choir members, led by Marieann Soriano, sang six songs from a hymnal before deacon Bernard Prado gave an emotional prayer that prompted some choir members to wipe away tears.

Then, Dela Cruz gave a sermon on the importance of remaining strong in the faith through serving God and worshipping him.

Susan Leongson, church finance officer, says: "We are very happy we can worship God in a proper place. For God, this is the most proper — more than we've been before."

Catholic teachings challenge increasingly progressive world: A Book Review

$
0
0
Author predicts Catholicism will not and should not change despite calls for acceptance of same sex marriage, female priests and an end to celibacy. [Iglesia ni Cristo cult members should note this!]

By Thomas Maupin Published: January 19, 2014 from NewsOK.com [all highlights are mine]

The Catholic Church has been around for roughly 2,000 years. With more than 1 billion members, it is one of the largest institutions— if not the largest institution — in the world. It has survived persecutions, heresies, the Great Schism and the Protestant Reformation. But what is its future?

Canadian writer Michael Coren, a 1985 convert to Catholicism, takes a look at his faith's future.

In the introduction, Coren looks back to the March 2013 papal election of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the questions of how the new Pope Francis would shape the church. Coren says the church might change some things but cannot and will not change its teachings.

Coren write, “The book is called ‘The Future of Catholicism,' not ‘How to Make Failed Catholics Feel Good About Themselves,' or ‘A Handbook for Catholics Who Want a More Protestant Church.'”

He reminds us the church “does not exist to change the faith to reflect the world but to change the world to reflect the faith.”

Coren believes the church's stand on traditional marriage will be “a point of persecution” for Catholics.

Some other faiths allow same-sex marriage, and Coren says many Protestants have converted to Catholicism because of its defense of traditional marriage. As more faiths and governments support same-sex marriage, Coren predicts the future Catholic Church “will be as countercultural as it was in its earliest days.”

You can't write about the church and avoid abortion and birth control. Coren covers the church's position on those issues and stresses the faith will not change its teachings just because the same old arguments are brought up by the opposition. He says the church's teaching is not about denying a woman's rights; it is about “expanding life.” On these issues, he advises the church “needs to explain not what its critics think it believes but it actually believes about this so personal and delicate an issue.” He warns that misunderstanding, abuse and anger will face the church because of the issues.

An Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) blogger branded the Catholic Church as The CHURCH

$
0
0

That's because the the Bible simply calls the Church founded by Christ as "The CHURCH". In grammar, the article "the" followed by a noun is definitive.

Here is what the dictionary explanation:

The definite article the is the most frequent word in English.

We use the definite article in front of a noun when we believe the hearer/reader knows exactly what we are referring to.

• because there is only one:

The Pope is visiting Russia.
The moon is very bright tonight.
The Shah of Iran was deposed in 1979.

This is why we use the definite article with a superlative adjective:

He is the tallest boy in the class.
It is the oldest building in the town.

• because there is only one in that place or in those surroundings:
Therefore from the mouth of the enemies of The CHURCH, we proclaim the truthfulness of The Church known througout the whole world as THE ONE, HOLY, CATHOLIC and APOSTOLIC CHURCH of CHRIST!
Viewing all 1135 articles
Browse latest View live